Syntopical Reading

Deep in a photo reading course, I’ve been introduced to a new topic, syntopical reading. This isn’t a technique for reading faster or pulling more information out of articles. Rather, it is an approach to learning more deeply about a desired topic. Coined in 1940 by philosopher Mortimer Adler, this term is simply described as reading more than one book on a certain subject.
This style of reading is considered by Adler to be one of the more advance stages of reading development. This is not to confuse the task as the only way to read written material. Integral reading, one book all the way through, should not be isolated as a poor style of comprehension, but as a different approach. He breaks reading styles into 4 levels.
- Elementary - basic reading (high school)
- Inspectional - looking for facts and pieces of interest
- Analytical - classifying and investigating reading (college)
- Snytopical - reading multiple books on the same subject (graduate work)
The benefits of syntopical reading move beyond simply acquiring a mass of information about a topic. The goal of syntopical reading is three fold. First, it allows the reader to see the connection between two works. Second, the juxtaposition of similar passages removed from their literary timeline, allows the reader to comprehend the topic at an advanced level. Lastly, the influence of one work on many, and the interpretation their of, allows the reader a broader understanding of the multiple meanings a passage may have.
One of the best things I’ve ever done for myself is read three books on sexual evolution back to back. The first one took a bit to stomp through, but by the third I was flying through it, absorbing new concepts rapidly. The varied opinions and views drastically enriched my knowledge of the subject. I view this now as a small taste of snytopical reading. Had I read the books in parallel, jumping books when citations were made, and subsidizing reading with other materials, I can only imagine the thoughts I would have on the subject. I see now a whole other world of interpretation awaits.
3 Responses to “Syntopical Reading”
Leave a Reply
Get Cash Back Online
All set now. Thanks Ben!
Search
Tips
Have a good tip? E-mail us at tips@urbanmonarch.com
random post
Check this out:Klaus Harmony: Porn Music.
Questions
Have a question you want answered? E-mail us at ask@urbanmonarch.com
Categories
- Arts & Culture (193)
- Bachelor Pad (13)
- Book Club (17)
- Featured (2)
- Food & Drink (219)
- Front Page (1)
- Health & Fitness (125)
- Lifestyle (566)
- Music & Media (446)
- Productivity (22)
- Reviews (1)
- Socializing (181)
- Style & Fashion (132)
- Technology (40)
- Travel (23)






i tend to do this more in regards to work, and it’s always a great way to learn certain coding variations, and why method a might be better than b in you instance. if combined with the right websites it’s a huge boost to optimization and just knowing the languges you’re dealing with.
I hit a new high w.r.t. syntopical reading when I started reading investment related books, websites, blogs, forums, etc. You could throw certain TV shows and magazines into the mix as well… media consumption overall of one topic can lead to finding a lot of connections between other works. It really hit me when I was reading a finance book that was criticizing another book I had read previously, that kind of thing reminds you to stay objective and remind yourself just because someone wrote it down doesn’t mean its the best advice out there.
I find when I get into a new activity or hobby I am consuming all sorts of media to learn more about it, everything from books to YouTube. Is there a concept that goes beyond reading and extends to consuming all media?
J & Goat; I agree that this applies to just a random sampling of media in general. When I get obsessed with a certain topic; say for instance my current obsession -better living thru chemistry- I completely absorb myself in everything from medical journals (online, natch), news articles, dissertations, random blogs, real world honest to God books AND the ‘educated’ opinions of those around me. All in all, far more comprehensive than trusting a single source.